'GREEN' IN VAIN?

Guest Column

Sarasota's Downtown Core (DTC) has a unique opportunity to become the highest contributor toward the preservation of our natural environment and resources, if only we have the courage of our convictions.  Which convictions?  Those defined by the community and reflected in the adoption of the Downtown Master Plan 2020.  Not by importing a suburban green band-aid vision of shrubbery, grass and berms into our vital commercial core, but rather by supporting a properly designed urban center that recognizes the importance of the long-term viability of our downtown.

Countries all over the world have welcomed New Urbanism, which is simply a reintroduction of the theories our cherished older towns and cities embraced before succumbing to society's relentless 100-year obsession with the automobile and technology.  Sarasota made history by being one of the first cities in the world to adopt a downtown land use code based on the New Urbansim-based SmartCode.  The SmartCode supports community vision, local character, conservation of open lands, transit options, and walkable and mixed-use neighborhoods.  Before we abandon these higher objectives arguing over the removal of a thin strip of grass or a black olive tree or two, perhaps some fundamental review is in order.  If you can forgive the technical nature of the conversation, here are important lessons here for us in Sarasota.

New Urbanists identify the differences among nature, rural land, neighborhoods, towns and cities by indexing human habitat area by 'Transect'.  There are six Transects professionally called T-1, T-2, T-3, T-4, T-5 and T-6.  Transect One (T-1) is the most natural environment, void of human habitat, with T-6 as the most urban environment humans inhabit.  Both T-1 (Natural Land) and T-6 (Urban Core) are the healthiest environments from a sustainability standpoint, with T-3 (Sub-Urban) and T-4 (General Urban) having the most impact on our environment.  New York City, particularly Manhattan T-6 zone is America's poster child for protecting the environment, because its density saves land, efficiently uses energy and attracts billions of people.

Each 'Transect' has a comprehensive list of what does, and does not, make up its unique built character.  For example, one expects to see a farmer in a barn milking a cow in a T-2 zone, which is farmland, but would not expect to see that in the DTC T-6 zone.  Therefore, the city does not allow milking cows or building barns on Main Street - at least one yet!

Many of the city neighborhoods are T-4, and on top of their environmental impact, much of the human habitat we created in Florida does not support a good quality of life.  Automobiles generate 30-60% of the carbons warming the air.  The average suburban household travels 14 car-trips a day and many Americans walk only four minutes a day.  Calibrating our T-6 DTC with T-1 through T-4 environmental tools eliminates the benefits of our T-5 and T-6 culture.  

We have built areas that have lost almost all sense of community by virtue of their separation.  The DTC and surrounding neighborhoods are supposed to be the opposite of that by being inclusive, cozy and compact.  A well designed downtown can include beautiful public spaces without becoming suburbia.  Amazingly, our small downtown is capable of achieving a place that embraces a vast variety of people in close proximity, but only by putting the right components in the right place.  Such as, a LEEDS building is wonderful, but not so wonderful if it is a Wal-Mart that requires its customers to travel miles to get to it.

Said more simply, it is vital to our future that the larger planning principles that are so widely embraced, and that have guided our planning during the early days of this millennium, not be forgotten or abandoned over the politically correct battle to save every individual tree or patch of grass.  Until be embrace a real Downtown Core surrounded by urban neighborhoods, we will continue to be driven by our suburban-sprawl mentality and to use the word 'green' in vain.

Denise Kowal

2 comments:

Jack Wagner said...

Re 'Dwarfed by Hotel ', Herald Tribune, 2.7.07. Your article fails to mention that the 80' Plaza Hotel will be the only 'business shoe-horned between downtown and US 41 in an otherwise residential neighborhood. Moreover, the ever- busy commercial traffic generated by the hotel will be on Elder and Alderman will ultimately overburden Palm Ave residential traffic flow. These streets are the only practical access since exiting at Palm onto the 'round Mound raceway' would be foolhardy. Regardless, we can only hope that these two small streets will not become flood plains after a rain. like Oak, the next street over.

Since this project is being 'fast-tracked' -the word on the street is 'done deal'- does it mean these issues will be ignored?

More alarming are the comments by Denise Kowal. She states that the Burns Square Property Association 'property owners have been working with Hochstadt for over a year'. Interesting that the property owners on Palm Ave - and most affected were not included.

In response to a query regarding saving the beautiful trees, she remarks, somewhat flippantly that, 'We'll yeah, it is a ...vacant property... worse kind of blight in an area like this.' To define this lot as blight is to ignore the aged, beautiful and irreplaceable tall trees. Blight comes in many forms Ms Kowal, and concrete is one. She really needs to be less self - serving in her commercial bent, take a stroll down Palm and observe the greenery and landscaping. Palm Ave by any definition is residential.

This hotel, without a 'green' setback re-defines 'concrete jungle'. It will the only building on this block of Palm that is totally devoid of landscaping.

Did the Commissioners not learn anything from the 1350 monstrosity?


Jack Wagner
BIRDBUSTERS
707 South Gulfstream Avenue, #405
Sarasota FL 34236

www.birdbusters.com
jackwagner@birdbusters.com

Main: 703.299.8855
Cell: 703.304.9493
Fax: 703.299.0844

Toll Free: 866.915.8225

Anonymous said...

Jack:

I appreciate your concerns about the Hotel project and I wish you would not make the letter an attack on my character. I am the president of the Property Owners Association for Burns Square and the owner of the project is an active member. He participated fully in every Charrette and planning session we have done for Burns Square. He, along with almost all of the property owners have contributed financially to the work we do in Burns Square.

When we held the Burns Square 2005 Charrette you all were invited and could have participated. I do not know why you did not but please do not make the fact that we in Burns Square work together a detriment to this community. I think the word 'alarming' is quite harsh for such.

Your statement that my comment about the trees was 'flippant' is also a gross over dramatization. He printed only a portion of everything he asked me. I have been working with the city and the owner to find out if any of those trees can be saved and transplanted in Burns Square...that he did not print. Nothing about the project is 'flippant' and nothing about my attitude is 'flippant'. I am disappointed you have pointed so much of your anger at me, someone who has done so much for this community as a volunteer. And, I have owned my property for 22 years and my family is the largest property owner in Laurel Park. I am quite aware of Palm Avenue and every other part that surrounds Burns Square...I fought with the Burns Court homeowners against the Savoy when it was being built trying to save the trees and make sure the development was scaled properly...you know nothing about me to be so disrespectful about my intentions.

Before you sent a letter to the editor it would be helpful if you asked before you took to attacking me.

I look forward to working with the owner of the project and the condominium associations to open up the communication between the two, which is underway.

Denise Kowal, President
Burns Square Property Owners Association